Elevated IOP After Laser Treatment

Laser procedures that are ordinarily safe can sometimes have unexpected outcomes.

By Frank Cao, MD; and Inci Irak Dersu, MD
 

Laser, an acronym for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation, has been available for ophthalmic use for almost 5 decades. Over the years, many different laser platforms have been introduced to treat a wide spectrum of eye diseases. Although laser surgery is considered relatively safe, efficacious, and cost-effective, several side effects have been reported in literature. Of these, a transient or sustained IOP elevation is of particular concern and significance in glaucoma patients. In this article, Drs. Cao and Dersu focus on laser capsulotomy, iridotomy, and trabeculoplasty, and they discuss the incidence and risk factors for IOP elevation after laser treatment and strategies to minimize and control pressure spikes.

SARWAT SALIM, MD | SECTION EDITOR

In modern ophthalmology, laser use is widespread and generally regarded as a safe intervention. For anterior segment surgeons, laser trabeculoplasty, iridotomy, and capsulotomy are common procedures. Although complications such as hyphema, persistent inflammation, and even retinal detachment have been reported after these procedures, the most common complication is an increase in IOP.1

LASER CAPSULOTOMY

Rates of IOP elevation after Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy have been reported to range from 4.4% to 41.0%.1,2 The higher rates are from the era before prophylactic antiglaucoma treatment was routinely applied. Use of antiglaucoma drops before and after treatment effectively lowers the risk of IOP elevation.3 IOP elevation associated with Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy is often transient without long-term damage and is typically observed within 2 to 4 hours after treatment.

AT A GLANCE

• Although laser use is generally regarded as safe, one of the most common complications is an increase in IOP.
• Most IOP elevations after laser use are transient and respond to medical therapy, but there are scenarios in which surgical intervention is required.

However, in rare circumstances, IOP elevation can be quite high, requiring additional intervention. In one reported case,4 IOP increased to 60 mm Hg by 24 hours after Nd:YAG capsulotomy, despite the use of apraclonidine before and after treatment and a normal IOP reading 2 hours after the procedure.

Reducing total laser energy levels, usually to less than 80 mJ, has been associated with a lower risk of IOP rise.5 Excessive pigment release, vitreous prolapse into the anterior chamber, pupillary block by vitreous or IOL dislocation, myopia, and preexisting glaucoma are known risk factors for IOP elevation. In one retrospective study of glaucoma patients who underwent laser capsulotomy, half of the patients needed additional antiglaucoma medications or surgery by 3 years after capsulotomy, although the study authors acknowledged that they did not know whether capsulotomy led to disease progression.6

In general, it is advisable to keep a close eye on patients with glaucoma after Nd:YAG capsulotomy.

LASER IRIDOTOMY

IOP elevation has been reported to be more common after Nd:YAG iridotomy than after Nd:YAG capsulotomy. A retrospective review of 340 patients who had capsulotomies and 212 who had iridotomies found IOP elevation of 10 mm Hg or more within 2 hours of laser surgery in 15 eyes (4.4%) after capsulotomy and 45 eyes (21.2%) after iridotomy.1 The mean increase in IOP postoperatively was 0.45 mm Hg after capsulotomy and 4.30 mm Hg after iridotomy.

Another retrospective review of 428 eyes of 298 patients who underwent Nd:YAG laser iridotomy at Singapore National Eye Centre found that 46 eyes (10.7%) had a postoperative IOP elevation of 8 mm Hg or greater and that 31 eyes (7.2%) had a postoperative IOP of 30 mm Hg or greater.7 This data set included 238 eyes with suspected primary angle closure, 85 eyes with primary angle closure, 92 eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma, and 13 eyes with acute primary angle closure. Patient age, sex, and race; total laser energy used; and the seniority of the physician performing the procedure were not found to affect the risk of postlaser IOP elevation. Patients with acute primary angle closure and those who received fewer prophylactic ocular hypotensive medications, either acetazolamide or brimonidine, were more likely to experience significant postlaser IOP elevation.7

In a large prospective study, 734 Chinese patients with suspected primary angle closure underwent Nd:YAG laser iridotomy in one eye while the fellow eye was used as control. IOP elevation greater than 8 mm Hg by 1 hour postoperatively was reported in 10% of treated eyes, and less than 1% of eyes had an IOP elevation greater than 8 mm Hg at 2 weeks after the procedure.8 Only four eyes developed an IOP greater than 30 mm Hg, requiring medical therapy. The risk factors identified for IOP elevation 1 hour after laser treatment were greater number of laser pulses, greater amount of laser energy used, and shallower central anterior chamber depth. In this study, all patients had received preoperative brimonidine 0.15% and pilocarpine 2%.

It is important to note that it can be difficult to differentiate between disease progression, IOP fluctuation, and persistent IOP elevation after iridotomy. Patients should be informed that additional medication and/or surgery may be needed after laser treatment.

LASER TRABECULOPLASTY

IOP elevation after argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) has been reported, and it appears to be correlated with the extent of trabecular meshwork treated.

ALT. In the Glaucoma Laser Trial, 34% of eyes had an IOP rise of 5 mm Hg or more, and 12% of eyes had an IOP rise of 10 mm Hg or more after 180° ALT.9

In a study comparing 360° ALT (n = 36 eyes) with 180° ALT (n = 84 eyes),10 an initial IOP rise of 4.0 mm Hg occurred in 83% of 360° ALT eyes and 60% of 180° ALT eyes. Maximum IOP on the day ALT was performed averaged 38.6±12.9 mm Hg in 360° ALT eyes and 31.8 ±9.0 mm Hg in 180° ALT eyes. The day after ALT, 43% of 360° ALT eyes and 10% of 180° ALT eyes had an IOP of 25 mm Hg or more.

SLT. The SLT pilot study reported a postoperative rise in IOP of 5 mm Hg after 25% of procedures (13/53 eyes) and of 8 mm Hg after 9% of procedures (5/53 eyes).11 Of note, ocular hypotensive medications were not used in the study in order to allow evaluation of the unmodified effect of the laser on IOP. Only 180° of trabecular meshwork was treated, and all IOP elevations were observed within 2 hours and resolved within 24 hours.

In a retrospective case series of 81 patients who underwent a total of 110 SLT procedures (a mixture of 180° and 360° treatments) performed by a resident ophthalmologist, a transient IOP rise of at least 6 mm Hg was seen after 7% of procedures. The highest IOP rise after treatment was 11 mm Hg.12

In another study, 167 eyes were randomly assigned to SLT (90°, 180°, or 360°) or topical latanoprost. The study authors reported a postoperative IOP elevation of 5 mm Hg or more in 11%, 16%, and 27% of eyes, respectively, after 90°, 180°, and 360° SLT.13 These findings suggest that more extensive treatment increases the risk of postoperative IOP elevation.

Prevention. A review of the literature suggests that perioperative medication is superior to placebo in preventing IOP elevation during the first 2 hours and up to 24 hours after laser trabeculoplasty. A 2017 Cochrane review of 22 trials (one using SLT and 21 using ALT) including 2,112 patients found that the risk of IOP elevation of more than 10 mm Hg within 2 hours after laser trabeculoplasty was decreased from 20% without medication to 1% with perioperative medication use.14 The same review found insufficient evidence to conclude that any one glaucoma medication or class of medication was superior in efficacy for preventing IOP elevation.14

Treatment. Rarely, an IOP spike after laser treatment may not respond to medical treatment. Two recent case series described persistently elevated IOP after SLT, requiring incisional glaucoma surgery. In one report including five patients with exfoliative glaucoma, all patients presented with diffuse corneal edema and IOP elevation requiring filtering surgery at 1 to 5 weeks after 360° SLT (energy: 0.7–1.9 mJ).15 Two patients had previously undergone both ALT and SLT in the lasered eye. Two cases required corneal transplantation in addition to filtering surgery. The study authors recommended using lower energy settings for exfoliative glaucoma and limiting treatment to 180°.

In another report, four patients with heavily pigmented trabecular meshwork (three had features of pigmentary dispersion syndrome) developed refractory IOP elevation after SLT.16 Three patients had 180° treatment, and one patient had 360° treatment. One patient was treated with medical therapy, three patients required trabeculectomy, and one patient required repeat trabeculectomy. All patients had received 0.2% brimonidine before laser treatment.

Caution should be exercised in heavily pigmented eyes and eyes with a history of laser treatment. It is also advisable to use lower energy and fewer applications or to treat 90° to 180° of the angle to prevent refractory IOP elevation after SLT.

CONCLUSION

Laser procedures that are normally deemed safe can have unexpected outcomes, albeit rarely with vision-threatening consequences. In many cases, adverse effects can be treated successfully with further intervention.

1. Shani L, David R, Tessler Z, et al. Intraocular pressure after neodymium:YAG laser treatments in the anterior segment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20(4):455-458.

2. Slomovic AR, Parrish RK. Acute elevations of intraocular pressure following Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(7):973-976.

3. Pollack IP, Brown RH, Crandall AS, Robin AL, Stewart RH, White GL. Prevention of the rise in intraocular pressure following neodymium-YAG posterior capsulotomy using topical 1% apraclonidine. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(6):754-757.

4. Nesher R, Kolker AE. Failure of apraclonidine to prevent delayed IOP elevation after Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1990;88:229-232; discussion 233-236.

5. Ari S, Cingü AK, Sahin A, Çinar Y, Çaça I. The effects of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy on macular thickness, intraocular pressure, and visual acuity. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012;43(5):395-400.

6. Lin JC, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL, Klancnik JM. Intraocular pressure control after Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy in eyes with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(3):337-339.

7. Lee TL, Yuxin NJ, Nongpiur ME, Tan WJ, Aung T, Perera SA. Intraocular pressure spikes after a sequential laser peripheral iridotomy for angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(0):644-648.

8. Jiang Y, Chang DS, Foster PJ, et al. Immediate changes in intraocular pressure after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):283-288.

9. The Glaucoma Laser Trial. Acute effects of argon laser trabeculoplasty on intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(8):1135-1142.

10. Mishima S, Kitazawa Y, Shirato S. Laser therapy for glaucoma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1985;13:225-235.

11. Latina MA, Sibayan SA, Shin DH, Noecker RJ, Marcellino G. Q-switched 532-nm Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty): a multicenter, pilot, clinical study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(11):2082-2088.

12. Greninger DA, Lowry EA, Porco TC, Naseri A, Stamper RL, Han Y. Resident-performed selective laser trabeculoplasty in patients with open-angle glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(4):403-408.

13. Nagar M, Ogunyomade A, O’Brart DPS, Howes F, Marshall J. A randomised, prospective study comparing selective laser trabeculoplasty with latanoprost for the control of intraocular pressure in ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1413-1417.

14. Zhang L, Weizer JS, Musch DC. Perioperative medications for preventing temporarily increased intraocular pressure after laser trabeculoplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD010746.

15. Bettis DI, Whitehead JJ, Farhi P, et al. Intraocular pressure spike and corneal decompensation following selective laser trabeculoplasty in patients with exfoliation glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:e433-e437.

16. Harasymowycz PJ, Papamatheakis, DG, Latina M, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) complicated by intraocular pressure elevation in eyes with heavily pigmented trabecular meshworks. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(6):1110-1113.

SArwat Salim, MD | Section Editor
• Professor of Ophthalmology, Vice Chair of Clinical and Academic Affairs, and Director of the Glaucoma Service at Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
• Member, Glaucoma Today Editorial Advisory Board
ssalim@tuftsmedicalcenter.org


Frank Cao, MD

• Ophthalmologist, Missouri Eye Institute
fcao@missourieye.com
• Financial disclosure: None

Inci Irak Dersu, MD
• Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York
• inci.dersu@downstate.edu
• Financial disclosure: None

 

Contact Info

Bryn Mawr Communications LLC
1008 Upper Gulph Road, Suite 200
Wayne, PA 19087

Phone: 484-581-1800
Fax: 484-581-1818

About Glaucoma Today

Glaucoma Today is mailed bimonthly (six times a year) to 11,519 glaucoma specialists, general ophthalmologists, and clinical optometrists who treat patients with glaucoma. Glaucoma Today delivers important information on recent research, surgical techniques, clinical strategies, and technology.